One thought on “Why is the Global warming and Climate Change question such a polemical subject?”

  1. https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-Global-warming-and-Climate-Change-question-such-a-polemical-subject/answer/TL-Winslow

    My reply:

    “A polemic (/pəˈlɛmɪk/) is contentious rhetoric that is intended to support a specific position by aggressive claims and undermining of the opposing position. “
    Polemic – Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polemic)

    Polemics is about all the U.N. IPCC (a political outfit backed by scientists) and its cheering section in NASA, NOAA et al. have left to keep hawking trillions in baksheesh to prevent their prophesies of global Armageddon from coming true. Meanwhile even after tricking-up the statistics, they claim barely 1C in global avg. temp rise since 1880.

    https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/history/ (https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/history/)

    The very idea of not just lone scientists but whole scientific orgs. attempting to push prophesies of the fat, er, far future is polemical, n’est-ce pas?
    Meanwhile I know that all along they have been framing CO2 for causing global surface temperature increases, because the iron laws of thermodynamics make this impossible. Often they try to confuse stratospheric temperatures with surface temperatures, but all their data is suspect of tampering as revealed by several independent critics such as Tony Heller, formerly of NOAA.

    y online essay is waking people up to the CO2 greenhouse warming hoax because the Earth’s atmosphere is not a greenhouse but a chimney, cooling the Earth by taking solar energy to space, with CO2 going along for the ride:

    TLW’s Two Cents Worth on Climate Change (http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html)

Comments are closed.