What do the 3% of scientists who do not believe that climate change is anthropogenic see that the 97% of scientists who do say that climate change is a result of human activity do not see?

https://www.quora.com/What-do-the-3-of-scientists-who-do-not-believe-that-climate-change-is-anthropogenic-see-that-the-97-of-scientists-who-do-say-that-climate-change-is-a-result-of-human-activity-do-not-see

One thought on “What do the 3% of scientists who do not believe that climate change is anthropogenic see that the 97% of scientists who do say that climate change is a result of human activity do not see?”

  1. My reply:

    When it comes to scientists, opinion polls don’t interest me, just the truth. There has never been a thorough questionnaire circulated to scientists with questions covering every possible viewpoint, just loaded questions, I wonder why?

    Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: Second Edition: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus 2, Craig Idso, Robert Carter, S. Fred Singer, Marita Noon – Amazon.com (https://www.amazon.com/Scientists-Disagree-About-Global-Warming-ebook/dp/B07CZBXY5P/)

    What do scientists who don’t believe in anthropogenic climate see? Simple, that the CO2 greenhouse warming theory is based on fake physics, because the Earth’s atmosphere isn’t a blanket or a greenhouse it’s a chimney, continually removing the heat deposited by the Sun and dissipating it in the infinite heat sink of space. Look up lapse rate in Wiki to see how the temperature systematically drops with height above the surface precisely because this chimney effect is in operation. The chemical composition of the atmosphere is irrelevant, only its great mass and the Earth’s gravity, which keeps the atmosphere from escaping to space or freezing and falling to the surface. This creates a powerful gravity gradient causing warm air to rise, expand, and cool all the way to space, similar to bubbles in an aquarium or hot smoke from a chimney. CO2 has no power to send the heat back down to the surface, period, that’s a hoax, and it’s sad but the fake field of climate science starts with this assumption, meaning an entire generation has been miseducated and should demand their money back and retrain for useful careers like nuclear energy.

    Lapse rate – Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapse_rate)
    Earth cannot heat itself by it’s own radiation | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/earth-cannot-heat-itself-by-its-own-radiation/)
    Back Radiation does not Create a Greenhouse Effect. (http://nov79.com/gbwm/bacr.html)
    Heat Flow Science Discredits Greenhouse Gas Theory | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/heat-flow-science-discredits-greenhouse-gas-theory/)
    Recycling of Heat in the Atmosphere is Impossible: A Note from Nasif S. Nahle (http://jennifermarohasy.com/2011/03/recycling-of-heat-in-the-atmosphere-is-impossible/)
    The Miseducation Of An Entire Generation: Climate Change | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/the-miseducation-of-an-entire-generation-climate-change/)
    Read my essay that completely explodes the CO2 greenhouse warming theory along with its blanket moose hockey. No scientist who grasps the iron laws of thermodynamics can ever refute it, because it’s the simple unvarnished truth.
    TLW’s Two Cents Worth on Climate Change (http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html)

    Whatever the percentage, there’s always been a goodly number of distinguished scientists who risked their career to speak out against the CO2 AGW outfit:
    Top Aussie Scientist Reveals UN IPCC Greenhouse Gas ‘Errors’ | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/top-aussie-scientist-reveals-un-ipcc-greenhouse-gas-errors/)
    TLW’s Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), “The Historyscoper”™ (http://www.historyscoper.com/climatescope.html)

Comments are closed.