One thought on “Affirmative action goes on trial: Supreme Court to re-hear University of Texas case”

  1. My reply:

    Saloon strikes again! The reasoning by Kennedy in the same-sex marriage ruling was full of IT, which is nice to know from a Saloonie, but if they had just used sex discrimination as the excuse, it would be okay because it would be based on existing federal law?

    Duh, what law is the Saloonie writer talking about? Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act? This only covers programs receiving federal financial assistance.

    This title declares it to be the policy of the United States that discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin shall not occur in connection with programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance and authorizes and directs the appropriate Federal departments and agencies to take action to carry out this policy. This title is not intended to apply to foreign assistance programs. Section 601 – This section states the general principle that no person in the United States shall be excluded from participation in or otherwise discriminated against on the ground of race, color, or national origin under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

    I guess then that all federal assistance to state marriage license offices is in big doodoo 🙂

    Oh, I know, the ERA 🙂 Oops, it has to PASS first. 🙂

    So, once again, lalala leftist Saloon shows that it’s living in a parallel dimension not ours 🙂 No wonder, since it keeps trying to defend the horrible ideology of ISLAM which treats women like dirt, and orders gays to be executed and sent straight to Hell. 🙂

    Seriously, until the REAL Congress passes a federal gay civil rights law, their marriage licenses might actually be used against them to get them fired, so they better hope they’re not put on a govt. Web site to make it too easy. Until the REAL Congress and REAL state legislatures pass a Constitutional amendment giving gays full equal rights, Supreme Court rulings on lawsuits will only be piecemeal, limited, and reversible by a future court, not to mention that politicians and govt. agencies can ignore them like they did the Dred Scott decision and tell them to stuff it. The charade set up by Kennedy et al. is ultimately going to go the way of the Dead Scotsman decision, so where is the Saloonie article calling for a new Constitutional Convention to totally rewrite it from the ground up to save the cause by an end-around run? It might start: “WE THE PEOPLE including all races EXCEPT pure whites, all religions EXCEPT those based on the Bible,…” 🙂 In the current climate created by Messiah Obama, it might actually sail through before the Conservatives can do diddly. 🙂

    Study the complete history of African-Americans, women, and gays so far with my inimitable free online courses at

Comments are closed.